On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:36:41 -0200, Felipe Bastos Nunes wrote:
> Looking in the documentation, only the StopIteration raises. I'd like a
> hasNext() too. I'll see if it is easy to implement,
Iterators can be unpredictable. In general, you can't tell whether an
iterator is finished or not until you actually try it. Consider the
following example:
def rand():
x = random.random()
while x < 0.5:
yield x
it = rand()
What should it.hasNext() return?
I know what you're thinking: "it's easy to cache the next result, and
return it on the next call". But iterators can also be dependent on the
time that they are called, like in this example:
def evening_time():
while 1:
yield time.strftime("%H:%m") # e.g. "23:20"
it = time_of_day() # it's 23:59
if it.hasNext(): # Returns True
time.sleep(180) # Do some other processing for three minutes
print it.next() # time is now 00:02, but iterator says it's 23:59
Of course, caching the result of an iterator can work for *some*
iterators. But it's not a general solution suitable for all iterators.
There is no general solution.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
