> Thanks for the confirmation Martin! > > Do you think, it the mentioned omission of the character names of some > CJK ranges in unicodedata intended, or should it be reported to the > tracker?
It's certainly a bug. So a bug report would be appreciated, but much more so a patch. Ideally, the patch would either be completely forward-compatible (should the CJK ranges change in future Unicode versions), or at least have a safe-guard to detect that the data file is getting out of sync with the C implementation. Regards, Martin -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
