On 2010-11-18, Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmic...@sequans.com> wrote:
> Tim Harig wrote:
>> If you are not already, I would highly suggest using Python3 with the
^^^^
>> subprocess module:
> Suggesting subprocess is a good idea, *highly* suggesting python3 is
> questionable. The above code works in python 2. Many libraries (those
> included batteries) have not been ported yet to python 3.
> Py3 is a better core language than py2, but for now, less featured.
I didn't, and I don't, recommend Python3 over Python2 for just any
purpose.I recommended Python3's subprocess module over the Python2's
subprocess module if that is indeed possible.
I happen to be one of those that feels this transition was terribly
mis-handled and that there should have been provisions to allow both
versions to either be maintained together or to allow modules from both
versions to work together. I don't really have a huge preference for
either version; but, having to deal with both of them has given the
project a black eye.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
