Both paradigms are in the bash shell. Using a test switch (like -x for
executiable) mixed with an && or ||.
Example:
[-x /usr/bin/firefox ] || exit
I think it's very clear, to old hands, but not so much for a new or
intermediate users.
It certainly is the 'cleaner' form. Like the C style increment " x++ "
or the insidious " x += 4 ". However I often found myself looking for
places to use "x += 4" instead of just using the clear:
"x = x + 4 ".
Unless there is a significant compiler/executable improvement it just
there to amuse yourself.
The
if v:
f()
structure is clearer. Which is the only reason to use indents, braces
and the like. I suppose that's my vote/opinion. Given a choice between
clean or clear, take clear.
sph
On 11/24/2010 10:46 AM, Gerald Britton wrote:
Writing in Python gives me the luxury of choosing different paradigms
for similar operations. Lately I've been thinking about a minor
detail that peaked my interest and am curious what others think:
Say that I have some function "f" that I will execute if some variable
"v" evaluates true. Using a classical procedural approach, I might
write:
if v:
f()
I might, however, think more in a functional-programming direction.
Then I might write:
v and f()
Interestingly, this second expression compiles smaller (though only by
a little) in both Python 2.6 and 3.1, which I currently have
installed. If I had thousands of such expressions, I could boast
about a measurable difference but practically speaking, it is not
significant.
What I _am_ interested in, however, is feedback from a style perspective.
What do the rest of you think about this?
Have you used the second approach and, if so, what was your motivation?
Is there a good/bad reason to choose one over the other?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
