Giacomo Boffi wrote:
Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> writes:
On 11/28/2010 3:47 PM, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
I had planned on subclassing Tkinter.Toplevel() using property() to wrap
access to properties like a window's title.
After much head scratching and a peek at the Tkinter.py source, I
realized that all Tkinter classes are old-style classes (even under
Python 2.7).
1. Is there a technical reason why Tkinter classes are still old-style
classes?
To not break old code. Being able to break code by upgrading all
classes in the stdlib was one of the reasons for 3.x.
In 3.x, are Tkinter classes still derived by old-style classes?
3.x does not provide old-style classes.
Oh, and the name Tkinter was changed to tkinter: all modules in the
standard library have lower case names in 3.x.
HTH,
-- HansM
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
