On Dec 5, 9:13 am, "rupertlssm...@googlemail.com" <rupertlssm...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Dec 5, 3:34 am, jvt <vincent.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >
> > I think this is correct: > > > (defun unknown-function (sym0) > > (let (sym1 sym2) > > (while (or sym2 sym0) > > (if sym0 > > (if (consp sym0) > > (setq sym2 (cons (cdr sym0) sym2) sym0 (car sym0)) > > (setq sym3 sym4 (cons sym0 sym1) sym0 nil)) > > (setq sym0 (car sym2) sym2 (cdr sym2)))) > > sym1)) > > Thank emacs, not me. > > Lisp? Still can't read it... ;-)- Hide quoted text - > This is because madhu did not explain how he reasoned. Does it appear to you that she broke first two rules. its a list flattener that also reverses the operation. it appears that she took the consp predicate and/or flatten and started googling ... naughty girl. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
