On Wed, 5 Jan 2011, Ben Finney wrote:

> > Tomasz Rola <rto...@ceti.com.pl> writes:

> > Heh. One day, guys, when you have nothing better to do, try writing a
> > parser for Lisp-like language (Common Lisp, Scheme, whatever). After
> > that, do the same with some other language of your preference (Python,
> > Java, whatever). Compare time and code spent...

> Perhaps Lisp is a simpler language to parse than Python.

> Perhaps a machine with only one instruction
> <URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_instruction_set_computer> is
> simpler to implement than one with a broader instruction set.

> So what?

So... nothing at all. My intention was to point out that parentheses (or 
rather, simple syntax that is enabled when using them) can give a boost in 
some situations. BTW, my own experience tells me, they are not really as 
bad as some folk tales imply. Of course, there is also esthetic reason - 
some people don't like parentheses, period. I am ok with this. Me, OTOH, I 
have esthetic incompatibility with Perl and to some extent with PHP. No 
problem for me :-).

Regards,
Tomasz Rola

--
** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature.      **
** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home    **
** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened...      **
**                                                                 **
** Tomasz Rola          mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com             **
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to