On Jan 6, 9:32 am, Tim Harig <user...@ilthio.net> wrote: > 2. Your so-called PEP probably clashes with Python's use of @ for > decorators. > > 3. Do you really expect a language holding the mantra that there should be > a single way of doing things to embrace a language bloating feature > for what is effectively already possible with the language as it > exists?
Isn't "Python's use of @ for decorators" a "language bloating feature for what [was] effectively already possible with the language as it [existed]?" ;-) Cheers, Ian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
