On Jan 18, 4:57 pm, Adam Skutt <ask...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 18, 4:45 pm, Arndt Roger Schneider <arndt.ro...@addcom.de>
> > E.g. a button is: > > A function gets asychnronously performed in response to > > a finger/mouse click and release inside a certain screen area. > > No, that is not the definition of a 'button', not even when we choose > to ignore how it is rendered, which you cannot ignore even if you wish > to pretend you can. Otherwise, I could always treat hyperlinks and > buttons as equivalent and even interchangeable. Unfortunately, they > are no such things. What! YES it is Adam! And you just exposed yourself as an argumentative moron! A hyperlink and a button are EXACTLY the same thing "functionality" wise. The fact that they look different has nothing to do with the argument. Would you say that a Ford Escort and a Dodge Viper do not function in basically the same way. Sure one looks much prettier and goes much faster however they both have four wheels, and engine, a drivetrain, an outer shell, burn gasoline, and are basically people movers. In other words they are both cars! *slap* > > --A widget is essentially a logical abstraction. > > No, as much as we try we cannot divorce presentation from behavior > fully. More argumentative crap. Adam you are incapable of compromise or reason... or maybe both. Try more facts next time. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list