On 01/20/2011 11:17 AM, Emile van Sebille wrote: > The problem with QT is the license.
PyQT indeed is licensed poorly for anything that's not GPL. But Qt itself is dual-licensed under GPL and the LGPL, as of version 4.6 I think. The LGPL license would seem to be quite acceptable even for commercial, closed-source programs. Is this not so? The license is at parity with GTK+. Eventually PySide will be stable and fast, and so the licensing issues involving PyQt won't matter. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
