On 2011-02-13 10:40 , sturlamolden wrote:
EPD is great, at least for scientific users. There is just one
installer, with everything we need, instead of struggling with dozens
of libraries to download, configure and build. It is still Python 2.7
(not 3.1) due to libraries like SciPy. A subscription for EPD is also
a contribution to the development of NumPy and SciPy.

I'd just like to jump in here to clear up this last statement as an Enthought employee. While Enthought and its employees do contribute to the development of numpy and scipy in various ways (and paying us money is a great way to let us do more of it!), there is no direct relationship to the revenue we get from EPD subscriptions and our contributions to numpy and scipy.

--
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
 that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
 an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to