On 16 Feb, 15:30, benhoyt <benh...@gmail.com> wrote: > It seems to me that the logging module should use a millisecond-accurate > timestamp (time.clock) on Windows, just like the "timeit" module does.
AFAIK, the Windows performance counter has long-term accuracy issues, so neither is perfect. Preferably we should have a timer with the long- term accuracy of time.time and the short-term accuracy of time.clock. Sturla -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
