Tom Zych wrote: > andrew cooke wrote: >> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 7368810 2011-02-27 13:03 /usr/local/bin/python3.2 >> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 7368810 2011-02-27 13:03 /usr/local/bin/python3.2m
> I suspect the "m" name is what gets built and the "no m" is an alias for > backwards-compatibility. Not sure why they did the "m", though. Ah, this may be it: http://bugs.python.org/issue9807 Search for "build flag". Apparently the "m" indicates that it was compiled with a nonstandard compiler option, or some such; maybe something to do with being on a 64-bit platform. The makefile or configure log may shed some light. -- Tom Zych / freethin...@pobox.com Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list