On Mar 18, 6:55 pm, Carl Banks <pavlovevide...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 18, 5:31 pm, J Peyret <jpey...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > If I ever specifically work on an OSS project's codeline, I'll post > > bug reports, but frankly that FF example is a complete turn-off to > > contributing by reporting bugs. > > You probably shouldn't take it so personally if they don't agree with > you. But it's ok, it's not unreasonable to call attention to (actual) > bugs here. >
No, I didn't take the refusal personally at all, though it seemed kinda glib to xhtml-not-hmtl out of a bug. Such is life. What I object to is getting auto-spammed for years after that because I was silly enough to enter my email on their database and then being notified about every single event on that bug. > I was surprised, though, when several people confirmed but no one > reported it, especially since it was a crash, which is quite a rare > thing to find. (You should feel proud.) > > Carl Banks Yes, that's why I reported it. Python is extremely stable so it seemed worthwhile. And I figured someone on the list would know its bug quotient. Impressed that there is already a bit of a proposed approach on the entry to fix it, you guys are great. But... I rather thought __repr__ was going to disappear in 3.x, with just __str__ sticking around. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
