Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> writes: > I don't know about that. Correctly, efficiently and *quickly* > implementing the three-argument version of pow is exactly the sort of > thing that should be in the built-ins, or at least the standard library.
There is also math.pow which works slightly differently from built-in pow, sigh. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
