On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:37:20 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote: > I actually think Python3 actually didn't go far enough in fixing > Python2. I'd have frankly preferred delaying it by a few years, to > allow PyPy to come to maturity and serve as the new main Python > implementation, and have that drive the language change decisions. > Instead we're going to have to give up a lot of possible improvements we > could have gotten from the new implementation.
There's always Python 4000 :) -- Steven -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
