Yes, running on pure python has the same issue (but overall only a factor 3 away):
i = 0 x = 1.0 while i < 10000000: x *= 0.8 #x += 0.01 i += 1 print x On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Philip Semanchuk <phi...@semanchuk.com>wrote: > > On Apr 26, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Mihai Badoiu wrote: > > > Already did. They suggested the python list, because the asm generated > code > > is really correct and the problem might be with the python running on > top. > > Does the same timing in consistency appear when you use pure Python? > > bye > Philip > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Chris Colbert <sccolb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Mihai Badoiu <mbad...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I have terrible performance for multiplication when one number gets > very > >>> close to zero. I'm using cython by writing the following code: > >>> > >>> > >> You should ask this question on the Cython users mailing list. > >> > >> > > -- > > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list