On Apr 27, 11:15 pm, Tim Golden <m...@timgolden.me.uk> wrote:
> Perhaps have a look at tinypy?
>
>    http://www.tinypy.org/
>
> Even if it's not exactly what you want, I expect that the
> author will have useful ideas / experience.
>
> TJG

Thanks, but I still need the completeness of CPython. AFAIK TinyPy is
a python implementation from scratch


On Apr 28, 4:06 am, "Martin v. Loewis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote:
>
> OTOH, you'll also find that the CJK codecs use quite some space,
> if you don't need them, they give a rather impressive reduction.
> Likewise for the Unicode database, although you may actually need
> it in some cases.


On the CJK issue, why python ship its own codec, not using OS builtin?

If I don't need the full Unicode5.1 can I just map python's unicode
functions to some Win32 unicode API?
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to