On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:48 PM, harrismh777 <harrismh...@charter.net> wrote: >>>> fs=[] >>>> fs = [(lambda n: i + n) for i in range(10)] >>>> [fs[i](1) for i in range(10)] > > [10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10] <=== not good > > ( that was a big surprise! . . . ) <snip> > lambda? closure? scope? bug? > > What is going on with the binding in the first construct... this seems > to reduce the usefulness of lambda to a considerable extent?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/233673/lexical-closures-in-python (See 1st and 2nd answers) Cheers, Chris -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
