Chris Torek wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Why do you think there's no Path object in the standard library? *wink*
In article <[email protected]>
Ethan Furman <[email protected]> wrote:
Because I can't find one in either 2.7 nor 3.2, and every reference I've
found has indicated that the other Path contenders were too
all-encompassing.
What I think Steven D'Aprano is suggesting here is that the general
problem is too hard, and specific solutions too incomplete, to
bother with.
Ah. In that case I completely misunderstood. Thanks for the insight!
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
