On Jul 5, 9:44 pm, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:53 AM, rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So you would start drivers education class with road construction? Or
> > the history of the internal combustion engine? Who cares about
> > actually *driving* the car.
>
> I believe that starting driver ed with some basics of how an internal
> combustion engine works would be a Good Thing. If you're going to be
> in control of a ton of steel that's capable of moving at a hundred
> kays, you ought to know at least a bit about what provides the kinetic
> energy.

How about kinetic energy itself? If you know *what* produces power to
induce kinetic energy into the vehicle but not *how* the laws of
physics govern kinetic energy; what damn good is that going to do for
you? How about some basics of safe/defensive driving? How about
considering the good of the many instead of the you?

> There's a difference between comprehension and jumping through hoops.

Likewise for priorities and acting aloof.

> If you force too much on people, they'll go
> elsewhere.

 Why all this running away with tail between legs?
 Do these these people have extremely small eggs?
 I wish they would stand firm and put up a fight
 instead they're just cowards spewing more endless tripe.


-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to