On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 2:15 PM, rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 4, 3:43 am, Gregory Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: >> rantingrick wrote: >> > what concerns me is the fact that virtual methods in derived >> > classes just blend in to the crowd. >> > I think we really need some >> > sort of visual cue in the form of forced syntactical notation (just >> > like the special method underscores). >> >> If you're suggesting that it should be impossible to override >> a method unless it is specially marked somehow in the base >> class, I think that would be a bad idea. > > Sorry i did explain properly... No NOT marked in the BASE class but > marked in the DERIVED class! My concerns are from a readability > standpoint.
I also like the idea of override annotations and I've created a blog post at: http://pydev.blogspot.com/2011/06/overrideimplements-templates-on-pydev.html to explain how I do use it (and in a way that I think should be standard in Python the same way it's in Java). Cheers, Fabio -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
