Christopher Subich wrote:
> You're off by a decimal, though, an 80-column line
> at 20ms is 4kbytes/sec.
D'oh! Yeah, I did hundredths of a second instead of thousands.
> My guess is that any faster throughput than
> 10kbytes/sec is getting amusing for a mud, which in theory intends for
> most of this text to be read anyway.
Which is why I don't think you'll have a problem with any of
the standard GUI libraries.
> That looks quite good, except that Trolltech doesn't yet have a GPL-qt
> for Win32.
Cost and license weren't listed as requirements. :)
You *did* say "hobby" though in post-hoc justification, I've known
people with some pretty expensive hobbies.
> See the scrolling problem in the original post, as to why I can't use it
> as a temporary user interface. :)
Indeed, but MUDs 15 years ago could run in a terminal and display
colored text via ANSI terminal controls, letting the terminal
itself manage history and scrolling. I had some sort of TSR for
the latter, under DOS.
Andrew
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
