In article <mailman.688.1314941609.27778.python-l...@python.org>, Matt Joiner <anacro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess the issue here is that you can't tell if an expression is > complete without checking the indent of the following line. This is > likely not desirable. I wrote a weird bug the other day. I had a function that returned a 4-tuple and wanted to unpack it, so I wrote: var1, var2, var3, var4 = my_function() which isn't a syntax error, but also isn't what I meant. Depending on whether var[123] have pre-existing values, this doesn't even produce a run-time error. Emacs encouraged me in this crime by merrily auto-indenting the code the way I expected :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list