"Mac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes on 7 Jun 2005 20:38:51 -0700:
> ....
> 1) I'd still like to run my whole app (i.e., using main()), but I'd
> like to limit the profiling to only the select few subroutines. That
> is, say I have a set of such fns in mind, call it "key_fns", and I
> would like to only profile # of invocations of these fns from key_fns,
> as well as by whom they were called, and how much cumulative time was
> spent in them. Is such lower-level control possible? The main reason
> I want this is that I do not want to profile most of the low-level
> routines, like vector addition, at least not yet... I don't want to
> slow down code execution any more than is necessary, as the statistics
> gathering should occur during "normal" runs (i.e., during normal
> operation).
Please read the "How it works section".
You find an example how the profiler can be customized
in my "ZopeProfiler" product (the "HLProfiler.py").
It makes profiling slower (as it derives high level profiles
in addition to the low level ones) but might nevertheless
help you as an example.
<http://www.dieter.handshake.de/pyprojects/zope>
> 2) I've only just discovered that pstats has "print_callers()"! That's
> very useful info I wasn't aware was available! What I'm really looking
> for now is profiler output in the style generated by "gprof", the GNU
> profiler, as I have found that format terribly useful (a section for
> each fn, with the fn's callers and callees interwoven in each section).
> Does anyone know of a utility which would format the Python profiling
> info in that format, or something very similar? I haven't actually
> seen any output from print_callers (can't find any samples on Net, and
> my app is currently half-busted, mid-refactor), so if that's what it
> precisely does, ignore this question.
Thus, you look at the internal representation of "pstats"
and format it in the way you like...
> 3) assuming the above-mentioned fine control of (1) is not yet
> possible, I will muddle on with my own "selective" profiling code; the
> question I have then is, what is the cleanest way to override a class
> instance's method at runtime?
class_.f = some_wrapper(class_.f)
> What my profiler is doing is overriding
> the key fns/methods of an instance with a stat-gatherer-instrumented
> version, which ends up calling the original method. I tried reading
> profile.py and pstats.py for ideas, but they are a little too
> complicated for me, for now; I doubt that's how they do their profiling
> anyways.
You should read the "How it works section".
You will find out that your doubt is justified...
Dieter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
