On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:36 PM, alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 5, 11:10 pm, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The absence from the language doesn't prove that. All it means is >> that, on those rare occasions when a goto would have been correct, the >> programmer had to make do with something else :-) > > Like the goto module? :) > > http://entrian.com/goto/
Yes. That module is extremely valuable and needs to be brought into the main trunk. Rick, can this go on your Python 4000 list? ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
