rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> writes: > This division (into object and rest of the world) is arbitrary and > historically a direct consequence of our scientific method; the use of > the classical concepts is finally a consequence of the general human > way of thinking. But this is already a reference to ourselves and in > so far our description is not completely objective.
Yes, it's natural for humans to think in dualistic terms – thinking that the self is separate from the external world – and that thinking is unsupported by evidence so is probably wrong. That doesn't argue against the position I've been elaborating, and it doesn't say anything against objective reality. We humans are part of that objective reality, and descriptions of reality need to incorporate that fact. -- \ “I got food poisoning today. I don't know when I'll use it.” | `\ —Steven Wright | _o__) | Ben Finney -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
