On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:39 AM, David Riley <fraveyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > True, and that does avoid polluting namespace. However, you shouldn't be > testing for None as a bool; you should instead do an "if <module> is None:" > (or, of course, "is not None").
Why not? Is there some other way for the module object to evaluate as false? ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
