I do not want GUI, I just want a console application which will read a single character input. When you read from stdin for example, you have it to be terminated.
2011/12/6 <python-list-requ...@python.org>: > Send Python-list mailing list submissions to > python-list@python.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > python-list-requ...@python.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > python-list-ow...@python.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Python-list digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Questions about LISP and Python. (Xah Lee) > 2. Re: Questions about LISP and Python. (Chris Angelico) > 3. Re: 70% [* SPAM *] Re: Re: multiprocessing.Queue blocks when > sending large object (Dennis Lee Bieber) > 4. Single key press (Sergi Pasoev) > 5. Re: Fwd: class print method... (Suresh Sharma) > 6. Re: Single key press (88888 Dihedral) > 7. Re: Single key press (88888 Dihedral) > 8. Re: Scope of variable inside list comprehensions? (Rainer Grimm) > 9. Re: Questions about LISP and Python. (alex23) > 10. Re: Questions about LISP and Python. (Matt Joiner) > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> > To: python-list@python.org > Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:36:45 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: Questions about LISP and Python. > On Dec 5, 4:31 am, Tim Bradshaw <t...@tfeb.org> wrote: >> On 2011-12-05 11:51:11 +0000, Xah Lee said: >> >> > python has more readible syntax, more modern computer language >> > concepts, and more robust libraries. These qualities in turn made it >> > popular. >> >> Yet you still post here: why? > > i don't like python, and i prefer emacs lisp. The primary reason is > that python is not functional, especially with python 3. The python > community is full of fanatics with their drivels. In that respect, > it's not unlike Common Lisp community and Scheme lisp community. > > see also: > > 〈Python Documentation Problems〉 > http://xahlee.org/perl-python/python_doc_index.html > > 〈Computer Language Design: What's List Comprehension and Why is It > Harmful?〉 > http://xahlee.org/comp/list_comprehension.html > > 〈Lambda in Python 3000〉 > http://xahlee.org/perl-python/python_3000.html > > 〈What Languages to Hate〉 > http://xahlee.org/UnixResource_dir/writ/language_to_hate.html > > 〈Xah on Programing Languages〉 > http://xahlee.org/Periodic_dosage_dir/comp_lang.html > > Xah > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> > To: python-list@python.org > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:10:27 +1100 > Subject: Re: Questions about LISP and Python. > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> i don't like python, and i prefer emacs lisp. The primary reason is >> that python is not functional, especially with python 3. The python >> community is full of fanatics with their drivels. In that respect, >> it's not unlike Common Lisp community and Scheme lisp community. > > So you hate Python. Fine. Why post here? Why not just abandon Python > as a dead loss and go code in Lithp? > > Clearly something is keeping you here. Is it that there's something > about Python that you really like, or are you just trolling? > > ChrisA > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfr...@ix.netcom.com> > To: python-list@python.org > Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:15:09 -0800 > Subject: Re: 70% [* SPAM *] Re: Re: multiprocessing.Queue blocks when sending > large object > On Mon, 5 Dec 2011 18:49:44 +0100, DPalao <dpalao.pyt...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >>Obviously it was not me who added the disgusting "70% [* SPAM *]" string to >>the subject. And I'd like to know the answer too. >> > Based upon your headers, somewhere your message went through a spam > check program... > > X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by > milter-greylist-4.3.7 > (monster.roma2.infn.it [141.108.255.100]); > Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:02:22 +0100 (CET) > X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, > Antispam-Data: 2011.12.5.74814 > X-PMX-Spam: 70% > X-PMX-Spam-report: The following antispam rules were triggered by this > message: > Rule Score Description > RDNS_SUSP_FORGED_FROM 3.500 From domain appears to be forged, > and arrived via a host with a known suspicious rDNS. > SXL_IP_DYNAMIC 3.000 Received via a known dynamic IP (SXL lookup): > 34.140.47.93.fur > FORGED_FROM_GMAIL 0.100 Appears to forge gmail in the from > FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD 0.050 Name in From header is a single word > BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0.000 Body size of the text/plain part is > less > than 3k > BODY_SIZE_1500_1599 0.000 Message body size is 1500 to 1599 bytes > BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0.000 Message body size is less than 2000 bytes. > BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0.000 Message body size is less than 5000 bytes. > BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0.000 Message body size is less than 5000 bytes. > RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED 0.000 Sender's PTR record matches generic pooled > -- > Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN > wlfr...@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/ > > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Sergi Pasoev <s.pas...@gmail.com> > To: python-list@python.org > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 10:19:55 +0430 > Subject: Single key press > Hi. > > I wonder if it is realistic to get a single key press in Python > without ncurses or > any similar library. In single key press I mean something like j and k > in Gnu less > program, you press the key and and it is captured by the script without need > to > press enter afterwards > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Suresh Sharma <ss27051...@gmail.com> > To: Lie Ryan <lie.1...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:23:16 +0530 > Subject: Re: Fwd: class print method... > Dave / Ryan > Thanks i have got it and it worked after using repr statement. Thanks > everyone for their valuable feedback. > > > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Lie Ryan <lie.1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 12/05/2011 10:18 PM, Suresh Sharma wrote: >>> >>> >>> Pls help its really frustrating >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Suresh Sharma >>> Date: Monday, December 5, 2011 >>> Subject: class print method... >>> To: "d...@davea.name <mailto:d...@davea.name>" <d...@davea.name >>> <mailto:d...@davea.name>> >>> >>> >>> Dave, >>> Thanx for the quick response, i am sorry that i did not explain >>> correctly look at the code below inspite of this i am just getting class >>> object at memory location.I am sort i typed all this code on my android >>> in a hurry so.indentation could.not.be.managed but this.similar code >>> when i run all my objects created by class deck are not shown but stored >>> in varioia meory locations. How can i display them. >>> >> >> I think you're in the right track, however I suspect you're running the code >> in the shell instead of as a script. The shell uses __repr__() to print >> objects instead of __str__(), so you either need to use 'print' or you need >> to call str(), note the following: >> >> Python 2.7.2+ (default, Oct 4 2011, 20:06:09) >> [GCC 4.6.1] on linux2 >> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >> >>> suits = ['spades', 'clubs', 'diamonds', 'hearts'] >> >>> ranks = ['A', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9', '10', 'J', 'Q', >> >>> 'K'] >> >>> class Card: >> ... def __init__(self, rank, suit): >> ... self.suit = suit >> ... self.rank = rank >> ... def __str__(self): >> ... return suits[self.suit] + ' ' + ranks[self.rank] >> ... >> >>> Card(2, 3) #1 >> <__main__.Card instance at 0x7f719c3a20e0> >> >>> str(Card(2, 3)) #2 of your >> 'hearts 3' >> >>> print Card(2, 3) #3 >> hearts 3 >> >> In #1, the output is the __repr__() of your Card class; you can modify this >> output by overriding the __repr__() on your Card class. >> >> In #2, the output is the __repr__() of a string, the string is the return >> value from __str__() of your Card class. The repr of a string is the string >> enclosed in quotes, which is why there is an extra pair of quotes. >> >> In #3, you're 'print'-ing a string, the string is the return value from >> __str__() of your Card class. There's no extra quotes, since 'print' prints >> the string itself, not the repr of the string. >> >> -- >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > > > > -- > Suresh Sharma > Regional Project Manager, > O2F,Mumbai > Maharashtra-400101. > > > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88...@googlemail.com> > To: comp.lang.pyt...@googlegroups.com > Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:27:48 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: Single key press > On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 1:49:55 PM UTC+8, Sergi Pasoev wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I wonder if it is realistic to get a single key press in Python >> without ncurses or >> any similar library. In single key press I mean something like j and k >> in Gnu less >> program, you press the key and and it is captured by the script without need >> to >> press enter afterwards > > Sounds like the fast key searching for a list in the DOS application in the > old days. > > This is easy in GUI of just tens of items, but for thousands of items such > as in a directory listing, some API is really slow. > > > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88...@googlemail.com> > To: python-list@python.org > Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:27:48 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: Single key press > On Tuesday, December 6, 2011 1:49:55 PM UTC+8, Sergi Pasoev wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I wonder if it is realistic to get a single key press in Python >> without ncurses or >> any similar library. In single key press I mean something like j and k >> in Gnu less >> program, you press the key and and it is captured by the script without need >> to >> press enter afterwards > > Sounds like the fast key searching for a list in the DOS application in the > old days. > > This is easy in GUI of just tens of items, but for thousands of items such > as in a directory listing, some API is really slow. > > > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Rainer Grimm <r.gr...@science-computing.de> > To: python-list@python.org > Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 22:42:35 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: Scope of variable inside list comprehensions? > Hello, > >> try: >> songs = [Song(id) for id in song_ids] >> except Song.DoesNotExist: >> print "unknown song id (%d)" % id > that's is a bad programming style. So it will be forbidden with python 3. The > reason is that list comprehension is a construct from the functional world. > It's only syntactic sugar for the functions map and filter. So functions have > to be pure functions. To say it in other words, they have to be side-effect > free. But the python construct from above pollutes the namespace with name id. > > Greetings from Rottenburg, > Rainer > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> > To: python-list@python.org > Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 23:02:42 -0800 (PST) > Subject: Re: Questions about LISP and Python. > On Dec 6, 2:36 pm, Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The python community is full of fanatics with their drivels. > > You do know that you could just fuck right off and leave us to it, > yes? > > In general, it's the person who is shrilly imposing their minority > opinion on a disinterested audience that deserves the title 'fanatic'. > > > > ---------- Message transféré ---------- > From: Matt Joiner <anacro...@gmail.com> > To: alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:54:09 +1100 > Subject: Re: Questions about LISP and Python. > This guy is an even better troll than that 88888 guy. His spelling is > equally bad. His essays make some good points, but I don't see why he > doesn't shut his trap and move on. > > ಠ_ಠ > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:02 PM, alex23 <wuwe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Dec 6, 2:36 pm, Xah Lee <xah...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> The python community is full of fanatics with their drivels. >> >> You do know that you could just fuck right off and leave us to it, >> yes? >> >> In general, it's the person who is shrilly imposing their minority >> opinion on a disinterested audience that deserves the title 'fanatic'. >> -- >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
