On 21 December 2011 18:57, Ian Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Joshua Landau
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > NOW (the PEP):
> > item = foreignfunc1~(item)
> > item = foreignfunc2~(item)
> > item = foreignfunc3~(item)
>
> Just a note: PEP 225 does not actually include this syntax for
> arbitrary function calls. It only proposes to augment the arithmetic
> and assignment operators.
>
Not quite. They never seem to have come to an agreement (the whole thing is
deferred) but they do touch upon "~f(x)":
5. Using ~ as generic elementwise meta-character to replace map
~f(a, b) # map(f, a, b)
~~f(a, b) # map(lambda *x:map(f, *x), a, b)
More generally,
def ~f(*x): return map(f, *x)
def ~~f(*x): return map(~f, *x)
...
I used "f~(x)" because it's not ambiguous with the current binary not operator.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
