On 5.2.2012 22:58, Ian Kelly wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Antti J Ylikoski<antti.yliko...@tkk.fi> wrote:
I'm not sure how naughty this is, but the same thing can be done without
using
nonlocal by storing the local state as an attribute of the enclosed
function
object:
...
Yes, I do know that, but then it would not be a closure :-)))))))))
Sure it is. Where do you think it looks up the function object?
Cheers,
Ian
OK, thank you for correcting me.
Andy
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
