PyPK wrote:
> One reason why I don't want to use PIL is it seems very slow for tiff
> images of very large sizes(2400x4800). So I am looking for a better
> tool than does the right job faster.
This isn't fast enough?
In [8]: %time img2 = Image.open('foo.tiff')
CPU times: user 0.00 s, sys: 0.01 s, total: 0.01 s
Wall time: 0.03
In [9]: img2.size
Out[9]: (2400, 4800)
--
Robert Kern
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
-- Richard Harter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
