On 3/18/2012 1:57, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 3/16/2012 21:04, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
People spell your name Stephen, sometimes too. Thinking of changing
it? Gore Vidal's quote has panache, a valid compensation for breaking
the usual rule. How many other uses on that page are similar?


He provided common examples and reference links. Seems like a pretty
reasonable way of trying to prove a point. If you don't like reference
links, what would convince you that the point was correct? I have not
seen any counter examples or counter references on your behalf...

He's referring to this "rule":
"A colon should not precede a list unless it follows a complete
sentence; however, the colon is a style choice that some publications
allow."
http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/colons.asp


That is an invented prescriptivist rule and not based on English grammar
as it actually is used by native English speakers. It is *bullshit*. Even
the author of that page breaks it. Immediately following the above
prohibition, she follows it with the sentence fragment:

"Examples:"

and then a list -- exactly what she says you may not do.

I never said that rule is acceptable. I agree with you on that.

People *do* precede lists by a colon following a sentence fragment. This
is unremarkable English grammar, with only a tiny number of arse-plugged
prescriptivists finding anything to complain about it, and even they
break their own bullshit made-up so-called rule.

The vast majority of English speakers write things like:

     TO DO:
     - mow the lawn
     - wash the car
     - take kids to the zoo
     - write book on grammar

and there is nothing wrong with doing so.

That's perfectly acceptable.
Robert Kern put it very well in his post:
"don't use a colon to separate a transitive verb from its objects".

You can't say
  TO DO
  - mow the lawn
  - ...
because "TO DO mow the lawn" doesn't "flow".
But why should we break a sentence when there's no need to do so?
Why should you write
  The matrix:
    ....
  is equal to....
Why the colon? Why break the flow of a sentence without reason?

I would generalize Robert Kern's rule a little:
"don't put a colon into a sentence which is fine already".

Example:
  You should
  - mow the lawn
  - do the dishes
  - walk the dog

That's perfectly fine. Commas are conveniently omitted.

As a side note, titles of movies, newspapers etc... don't follow common rules. Articles may be omitted, verbs may be missing, etc... They're just titles.

Kiuhnm
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to