On 2012-04-26, Neil Cerutti <ne...@norwich.edu> wrote:
> I made the following wrong assumption about the csv EBNF
> recognized by Python (ignoring record seps):
>
> record -> field {delim field}
>
> There's at least some csv "standard" documents requiring my
> interprestion, e.g.,
>
> http://mastpoint.curzonnassau.com/csv-1203/CSV-1203.pdf
>
> but by no means all. That's why I thought it might be something
> that should be documented rather than discovered.Of particular note, a recent patch added a reference to RFC4180 (though not stating that it is compliant), which also does not recognize zero field length records. -- Neil Cerutti -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
