On 06/05/2012 09:24, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Bob Cowdery <b...@bobcowdery.plus.com> wrote: >> On 05/05/2012 23:05, Cameron Simpson wrote: >>> Thought #1: you are calling time.time() and haven't unfortunately >>> renamed it? (I doubt this scenario, though the lack of fractional part >>> is interesting.) >> Not sure what you mean by renamed it. I also tried datetime and that had >> the same behaviour. > In Python, names are nothing special, so you could do something like: > > time.time = lambda: 142857 > > which means that time.time() will forever return that constant. > > Take a snapshot of time.time early in your code somewhere, and try > using that instead, just in case. It's a long shot but might save you > some insanity! Thanks. I will try that. Away now until Monday when the battle will resume.
Bob > ChrisA -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
