On 17 juin, 15:48, Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> wrote: > Am 17.06.2012 14:11, schrieb jmfauth: > > > I noticed this at the 3.3.0a0 realease. > > > The main motivation for this came from this: > >http://bugs.python.org/issue13748 > > > PS I saw the dev-list message. > > > PS2 Opinion, if not really useful, consistency nver hurts. > > We are must likely drop the ur"" syntax as it's not compatible with > Python 2.x's raw unicode notation.http://bugs.python.org/issue15096 > > Christian
Yes, but on the other side, "you" (core developers) have reintroduced the messs of the unicode literal, now *assume* it (logiccally). If the core developers have introduced rb'' or br' (Py2)' because they never know if the have to type "rb" or "br" (me too), what a beginner should thing about "ur" and "ru"? Finally, the ultimate argument: what it is Python 3 supposed to be? A Python 2 derivative for lazy (ascii) programmers or an appealing clean and coherent language? jmf -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
