Ross Ridge <rri...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > No, they're very much alike. That's why all your arguments for print > as function also apply just as well to pass a function. Your arguments > had very little to do what what print actually did.
Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >Except that print / print() is executable. Execution proceeds through >your code, comes to a "print", and goes off to handle that, then comes >back to your code. But "pass" doesn't have code attached to it. Why >should it be a function? For consistancy with print. What it does doesn't matter any more than what print did mattered. Ross Ridge -- l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU [oo][oo] rri...@csclub.uwaterloo.ca -()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/~rridge/ db // -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list