2012/7/31 Laszlo Nagy <gand...@shopzeus.com>: >> I think I got it now, if I already just mix the start before another add, >> inside the Process.run it won't see the new data that has been added after >> the start. So this way is perfectly safe only until the process is launched, >> if it's running I need to use some multiprocess-aware data structure, is >> that correct? > > Yes. Read this: > > http://docs.python.org/library/multiprocessing.html#exchanging-objects-between-processes > > You can use Queues and Pipes. Actually, these are basic elements of the > multiprocessing module and they are well documented. I wonder if you read > the documentation at all, before posting questions here. > > > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
As I wrote "I found many nice things (Pipe, Manager and so on), but actually even this seems to work:" yes I did read the documentation. I was just surprised that it worked better than I expected even without Pipes and Queues, but now I understand why.. Anyway now I would like to be able to detach subprocesses to avoid the nasty code reloading that I was talking about in another thread, but things get more tricky, because I can't use queues and pipes to communicate with a running process that it's noit my child, correct? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list