On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Steven D'Aprano <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:40:13 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > >> I think the documentation for those functions is simply badly worded. >> The "width in bytes" it returns is not the width of the rune (which as >> jmf notes is simply an alias for int32 that stores a single code point). > > Is this documented somewhere?
http://golang.org/ref/spec#Numeric_types -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
