On 24 September 2012 23:26, Dwight Hutto <dwightdhu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > > jimbo1qaz wrote: > >> > >> On Sunday, September 23, 2012 9:36:19 AM UTC-7, jimbo1qaz wrote: > >>> > >>> Am I missing something obvious, or do I have to manually put in a > counter > >>> in the for loops? That's a very basic request, but I couldn't find > anything > >>> in the documentation. > >> > >> > >> Ya, they should really give a better way, but for now, enumerate works > >> pretty well. > > > > > > ROFLOL!! > > > > I look forward to the day when you look back on that statement and think, > > "Wow, I've come a long way!" > > > > It's a function usage. Not to be too serious, there are usually > simpler solutions, and built in functions. > > But you usually sticks with what works, and seems timely in return of > data output > This is not a criticism, but actual curiosity. *How* would one implement this better, more simply (for the user, not the implementator) or in a more readable manner? Chose *any* one of those.
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list