Le mercredi 26 septembre 2012 16:56:55 UTC+2, Chris Angelico a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:50 AM, <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I just see the results and the facts. For an end > > > user, this is the only thing that counts. > > > > Then what counts is that Python 3.2 (like Javascript) exhibits > > incorrect behaviour, and Python (like Pike) performs correctly. > > > > I think this tee applies to you. http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/f147/ > > > > ChrisA > > wouldn't have bothered to respond except that that link was asking to be > shared
"You" have gained a broader range of unicode code points and the same time you "broke" a correct BMP behaviour. There is a simple solution to solve this. "You" do not wish to use it. Luckily for me, the tools I'm using use that one. jmf -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
