On 27/09/2012 17:16, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:11:13 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Steven D'Aprano
<steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:15:00 +0100, Mark Lawrence wrote: And a
response:
http://data.geek.nz/python-is-doing-just-fine
Summary of that article:
"Sure, you have all these legitimate concerns, but look, cake!"
Did you read the article or just make up a witty response? If so, you
half succeeded.
It's more like, "Well, maybe, your concerns *might* be legitimate, but I
don't think so because..." and then he gives half a dozen or more reasons
why Python is in no danger. None of which involve cake, although one of
them did involve Raspberry Pi. An easy mistake to make.
Haha! :)
Well, I don't agree. But let me explain.
[snipped]
-- Devin
The article Steven D'Aprano referred to is not a direct response to the
article I referred to, yet your words are written as if it were. May I
ask why? Or have I missed something?
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
