On Sunday, 7 October 2012 10:32:45 UTC+5:30, rusi  wrote:
> On Oct 7, 9:15 am, Ramchandra Apte <maniandra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sunday, 7 October 2012 00:13:58 UTC+5:30, Darryl Owens  wrote:
> 
> > > I am currently starting my PhD in software quality assurance and have 
> > > been doing a lot of reading round this subject. I am just trying to find 
> > > out if there is any relevant/current research in the production of a 
> > > generic quality assurance tool i.e. a tool/methodology that can accept 
> > > many languages for the following areas:
> 
> >
> 
> > > •        Problems in code/coding errors
> 
> >
> 
> > > •        Compiler bugs
> 
> >
> 
> > > •        Language bugs
> 
> >
> 
> > > •        Users mathematical model
> 
> >
> 
> > > I would greatly appreciate any input and advice in this area, feel free 
> > > to repost on this topic and/or contact me at: owens.darryl....@gmail.com
> 
> >
> 
> > > Thank you in advance
> 
> >
> 
> > > Darryl Owens
> 
> >
> 
> > Does this have anything to do with Python?
> 
> 
> 
> Why not?
> 
> 
> 
> >
> 
> > Banned from #python-offtopic till Christmas
> 
> 
> 
> Did you wait for an answer?

no
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to