In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 6/22/2005 1:14 PM, Dave Cook wrote: >> On 2005-06-22, Cameron Laird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>>Are you saying that Python-based applications are particularly >>>vulnerable in this all-too-common scenario? If so, I'm not >>>getting it; why is the architecture described more fragile than >>>more traditional Windows-oriented development patterns? If not, >>>then, ... well then I truly don't get your point. >> >> >> Maybe the point is the downside of depending on installed DLLs rather than >> shipping your own. >> >> Dave Cook > >Yes, DLL hell.
? OK, I'm with you part of the way. Typical "Access" developers are *always* involved with DLL hell, right? You're surely not saying that Python worsens that frustration, are you? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
