On Oct 25, 9:30 pm, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:17 AM, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Oct 25, 8:57 pm, Steven D'Aprano <steve > > +comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: > >> py> min(t.repeat(number=10000, repeat=7)) > >> 0.6819710731506348 > >> py> min(t.repeat(number=100, repeat=7)) > >> 4.141788959503174 > > >> That makes the "inelegant" solution using bin() and count() about 600 > >> times faster than the mathematically clever solution using bitwise > >> operations. > > > You meant 600% I think? > > It took six times longer to do one hundredth the iterations. > > ChrisA
Oh! Missed the number= -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list