On 20/11/2012 4:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:57 AM, <wxjmfa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 09:09:50 UTC+1, Chris Angelico a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Pavel Solin <solin.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps you are right. Is there any statistics of how many Python
programmers are using 2.7 vs. 3? Most of people I know use 2.7.
If you're teaching Python, the stats are probably about zero for zero.
Start them off on Py3 and help move the world forward.
ChrisA
--------
Do not count with me.
The absurd flexible string representation has practically
borrowed the idea to propose once Python has a teaching tool.
To the OP: jmf has an unnatural hatred of Python 3.3 and PEP 393
strings. Take no notice; the rest of the world sees this as a huge
advantage. Python is now in a VERY small group of languages (I'm aware
of just one other) that have absolutely proper Unicode handling *and*
efficient string handling.
ChrisA
It's interesting to see that someone else finds the format function to
be a pain. Perhaps the problem lies with the documentation.
Colin W.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
