On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:59:04 -0500 Kene Meniru <kene.men...@illom.org> wrote: > Yes, I guess that is the main thing. I do not want users to have to > write python code unless they are interested in customizing how the
That works too. It's just that you had users writing Python code but assumed that a three line subclass was beyond them. Not requiring them to write any Python code is a better option than the first one (global variables) that you proposed. That's all I am trying to say. > program behaves or perhaps a building component. In that case any of > the other modules can be updated instead of "A". Actually "A" will > not be part of the packaged program. Or "A" becomes the script that parses the config file and runs the other code. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <da...@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: da...@vex.net -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
