Chris Angelico於 2013年1月12日星期六UTC+8下午12時40分36秒寫道： > On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Rick Johnson > > <rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > *The problem:* > > > ... is readability. The current dot syntax used ubiquitously in paths is > > not conveying the proper information to the reader, and in-fact obfuscating > > the code. > > > > Please explain how this is a problem. As Steven said, there is NO > > useful difference. I don't *care* whether it's a package, a module, or > > whatever. Module with class with static member? Fine. Package with > > module with class? Also fine. Imported special object that uses dunder > > methods to simulate either of the above? What's it matter to me, as > > long as I get my final result! > > > > Syntactic salt is seldom helpful. > > > > ChrisA This is somewhat like the following problem.
Do we have to argue with people about the tastes of dishes in different restaurants ? Of course, I do because I love to enjoy fine dishes. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
