> if a.value == True: > return a > if not database.connect == error: > database.query(q)
Yeah, yeah, I know that :-) What I mean is that most of the time I find the code more "readable" (I know that more readable code ain't better code, but it helps when you work with other people...). > "unless" seems to become "while not", as opposed to "if not". Should be > more consistent. My mistake :-S The comment in the code was erroneous, I shouldn't write messages to the list while asleep ^_^ 'unless' works as 'if not', not as 'while not'. Sorry for that :-) Anyway, it does improve readability. I know that it doesn't necessarily makes code better, but it's a nice "trick" that I like :-) Other nice thing about ruby is declaring regexps as /regexp/ rather than having to re.compile("regexp"), and having a built-in operator to match against them (of course, as everything in ruby, overloadable in each class :-)) -NIcolas -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list