In article <[email protected]>, David Robinow <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Steven D'Aprano > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:53:47 -0500, Devin Jeanpierre wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Chris Angelico <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Yes, but reply-all sends a copy to the poster as well as the list. What > >>> I want is reply-list, acknowledging the list headers... and Gmail > >>> simply doesn't have that. > >> I've been replying to the poster and the list for ages. Is it bad > >> netiquette? > > > > I find it annoying, and yes I consider it rude. When we receive messages > ... > Do you consider it rude that you choose to use a newsreader, thus > inconveniencing those of us who use the mailing list, as God intended. > (I honestly can't remember if there's any advantage to News, not > having used it this century) > [Going out of my way to respond only to the list] There's a number of advantages to news vs. mail. The biggest is that news spools generally keep a long history around, so it's easy to go back and review a long thread. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
